|
Post by WCA on Jan 8, 2006 13:56:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Brian G on Jan 8, 2006 18:44:46 GMT
Ok are we up for the Intersite Series, can we improve on last years performances, will the venues be better situated, I do think that the venues should be central to the area and not on the extremes of it.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Jan 8, 2006 18:52:57 GMT
Do we have any proposed dates as yet? I see there is a reference to a date in June for the Midlands leg.
Also, is this still a 4 site series or is the 5th site (matchangler.com?) taking part?
As Webbo is standing down for business reasons there needs to be a coordinator - ideally somebody who uses/visits all the sites. You happy to do that WCA? Perhaps then each site could organise the match in it's region, with the 4/5 regional organisers liaising with the coordinator.
Stu
|
|
|
Post by Brian G on Jan 8, 2006 18:54:47 GMT
Stu the reference to the Midlands match was last years date.
|
|
|
Post by Stu on Jan 8, 2006 18:57:47 GMT
Ok Brian, thanks for the explanation. I must remember that it is now 200 6!
|
|
|
Post by WCA on Jan 8, 2006 19:31:27 GMT
Stu I posted on MD it would be great if each site `adopted` a leg.IMO it would make sense for you lads to choose the Midlands so you get a `home` venue.At the moment it`s 4 sites but I`m giving MA until the 29th so if there`s any provisional booking of waters it will be 50 with a view to reducing it to 40.I will gladly correlate results but as you can appreciate,with Mod/Admin of 5 sites plus a couple of TFClub comps,there`s not much room for organising 5 rounds plus the individual.
|
|
|
Post by WCA on Jan 8, 2006 19:42:37 GMT
HOW ABOUT TO TAKE CONTROL OF EACH LEG:-
Anglingforums.........North
Maggotdrowners......West
Talkangling.............Mids
Totalfishing.............South
Matchangler............East
If MA cannot take part then the organiser from each site can get together and decide the East.
These are no way set in stone so let`s discuss
|
|
|
Post by CJA on Jan 8, 2006 19:48:46 GMT
that way or make them more central
|
|
|
Post by WCA on Jan 8, 2006 19:54:29 GMT
More central for who??
The majority,or at least half of the MD team are Welsh.Nearly all of AF are North...TA Mids etc...
As I said it`s not set in stone but I believe this way each team gets a home draw.
|
|
|
Post by Dave on Jan 8, 2006 21:46:28 GMT
sounds good what is this match as im new to the website
|
|
|
Post by polepot on Jan 8, 2006 22:19:51 GMT
I would have thought that most md's active @ intersite men' where from the north east, not the west. But what do I know
|
|
|
Post by echoromeo on Jan 9, 2006 16:56:54 GMT
Neil, quite a few are not, Malc, Peter, Dai, Dan, Steve, Matt, Kev, Snakey, Quietman, just a few examples
|
|
|
Post by WCA on Jan 10, 2006 19:18:02 GMT
Here are a couple of suggestions I was sent.See what you think.
Venue choices: The teams that win each round pick next years venues (as an incentive to win ) Alternatively let the final overall placings of the teams dictate who gets the choice of next years venues.
If a site can't find a place then it will be thrown open for choice or put in place a short list and time limit and if a site hasn't picked a venue then one will be picked by default ?
Prizes :
As you know there were rumours/suggestions of the pools money attracting outsiders/ringers/non site members.
Would trophies be better ?
A small team shield/trophy and 1st,2nd,3rd medals.
|
|
|
Post by polepot on Jan 11, 2006 3:23:39 GMT
dEFINITELY DAVE, IT AINT FOR THE MONEY, IT'S ABOUT THE GLORY
|
|
|
Post by echoromeo on Jan 11, 2006 22:47:39 GMT
Good to see some early posts for this, plenty of time for some plans to get sorted
|
|